No Country for Old Bigots
By Larry Elder
Thursday, , February 28, 2008
|
Bookings to promote my new book, "Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card -- and Lose," have been difficult. Many media outlets -- television, radio, magazines -- flatly turn me down, because they find the title "offensive." The unwillingness to offend, to avoid the appearance of racism, proves one of the main points of my book -- that white racism no longer poses a significant problem in American life.   Rev. Jesse Jackson answers questions during the Reuters Housing Summit in New York February 20, 2008. REUTERS/Chip East (UNITED STATES)
A man's 7-year-old son spotted his dad's recently purchased copy, and asked him, "Why is the book called 'Stupid Black Men'?" Dad wrote and asked me how to answer. "Well, in writing," I responded, "sometimes authors say one thing when they mean something different. Some call this 'tongue-in-cheek' or 'irony' or that the writer is being 'coy.' All these funny words mean that the writer really means something very different from what, at first, it seems like he is saying. "You know how sometimes I'll look at my watch and say, 'Wow, time really flew by.' I don't mean my watch grew wings like a bird and flew away. I mean that we were having so much fun, it got really late, and I didn't know it was almost time for dinner! "You know how Mommy stands at your bedroom door when you haven't made your bed, and she says, 'My, this sure looks clean and neat'? She really means, 'You get in here and clean your room!' "Suppose Mommy took a picture of your messy room, wrote on the picture 'My Child's Clean Room,' and taped it to the bathroom mirror. Why would she do that? Mommy is trying to get you to do the right thing by showing you how bad your room looks when it's messy. She wants to get your attention by saying one thing, when she means something different. This book got your attention and got you to ask me about it, didn't it? "Now if you read the book, you would find that the book is not really calling black people -- or any other group -- 'stupid.' It says don't let people confuse you when they say things that are not true. What kinds of things? Things like, 'Most people are out to get you because you are black.' Or, 'Because you are black you can't do well in life no matter how hard you work.' Or, 'White people are really mean to black people.' "Those things used to be true a long time ago, but they are no longer true. The book is saying life is good. So don't let people treat you like you are stupid -- and make you angry and unhappy with life -- by saying things about you, about other people, and about our country that are not true. The book says, 'Think for yourself. Believe in yourself, work hard and enjoy life. You are not stupid. So don't let people treat you as if you are.'" Dad wrote me back and thanked me. I recently flew to New York to promote the book. I met a lady who described herself as a) an actress, b) performing in Santa Monica, a hyper-liberal town next to Los Angeles, and c) Jewish. Probably not a Reagan Republican, I thought. Actress: Why are you going to New York? Me: To promote my new book. Actress: What's it called? Me: Well … let me first tell you about the book, and then I'll tell you its title. Actress: Fine. Me: White racism no longer poses a major problem in America. Actress: Really? Me: You mean, really -- that's what the book is about? Or really -- that I actually believe that? Actress: Both. Me: "Black America," if a separate country, would rank No. 16 of the top countries in the world, as to GDP; and the black middle class continues to thrive, an advancement that preceded affirmative action. But Hillary Clinton, before a black audience, accused the then-Republican Congress of being run like a "plantation." Actress: I see. Me: Why do Democrats say things like this? Because without that monolithic black vote -- 90 to 95 percent at the presidential level -- the Democratic Party cannot win. Democrats have not carried the "white vote" since the '60s. Suppose 70 percent of Jewish children were born outside of wedlock; that the prison population were 50 percent Jewish men; that Jewish urban high schools had a 50 percent drop-out rate; and that 25 percent of Jewish young men -- late teens or early 20s -- had criminal records, meaning in jail, on parole or on probation. And suppose that the so-called "Jewish leaders" blamed this on anti-Semitism. How would you feel? Actress: I would resent it. Me: Now, let me tell you the title. It's called "Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card -- and Lose." Actress: Fantastic title. |
4 comments on No Country for Old Bigots (jessy)
Add a comment
To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster
Interesting contrast, because the Jews have suffered much, much worse persecution and horrors than the Blacks ever did---and for millenia, no less! And yet they thrive! You don't see them bellyaching about needing more handouts. (Amazingly, after the Shoah, many of those victims were loathe to accept a handout----yet certainly THEY of all people would have been rightful recipients of it!)
Complicated etiology, Joe. My personal take on it is this: historically, they suffered horrendously (not just in Europe, but even in B.C. times), so they are absolutely PARANOID about persecution and mass-slaughter (a la Hitler). Thus, they ally themselves with other underdogs as a tactic. (I don't really think they "like" those allies; do you see Jews in their personal lives thick with Blacks? ONCE I knew a young Jewish guy who had married a [cafe au lait] Black gal.) And voting for the Asses is because, well, the Donkeys have always painted themselves as the saviors of the underdog. Historically (not in the U.S., of course, but elsewhere), Jews were underdogs, so they got locked into that voting stance even after they no longer WERE underdogs (but the undercurrent FEAR of once again becoming underdogs continues to freeze them into voting Demo).
Just my theory.